Home Community Our Writers Men's Health AI & Tech Caregivers Join Free

Using AI to Have the Conversations You Keep Putting Off

I avoided a conversation with my ex for eleven months.

Produced with AI under BRICK30’s editorial standards. For educational and informational purposes — not a substitute for professional medical or mental-health advice. Speak with a qualified clinician about your specific situation. See our Medical Disclaimer. In crisis? Call or text 988 (US Suicide & Crisis Lifeline).

Not an argument. Not a fight. A conversation about why our finances were structured the way they were, and whether that structure still made sense, and what I actually wanted from the next chapter of things. A conversation where I had feelings and opinions that I couldn’t seem to locate when she was in the room.

Eleven months. I know exactly when I started avoiding it because I remember the Thursday evening it first came up and I changed the subject, looked at the clock, said I was tired. Then I did that same move enough times that the conversation stopped being offered.

Here’s What I Did Instead

I typed it out. Not to her. To Claude.

I’m not telling you this because it’s a life hack. I’m telling you because it did something I didn’t expect, and I spent a long time not understanding why it worked, and then I did understand, and now I think it’s actually worth explaining.

I typed the whole situation out — what was bothering me, what the actual disagreement was, what I thought I wanted, what I was scared of. Claude asked me questions. Not soft questions. Specific ones. “When you say you want things to be clearer — clearer in what way? What would it look like if it were clear?” I had to answer. I couldn’t shrug or change the subject or look at the clock.

Somewhere in the third or fourth exchange, I found the sentence. The actual thing. Not the presenting complaint, not the surface frustration, but the thing underneath it that I’d been trying to get to for eleven months and couldn’t get to because I couldn’t be alone with the thought long enough for it to surface.

The conversation I eventually had with her was still hard. But I knew what I was trying to say. That’s not nothing.

Why Men Don’t Have These Conversations

I’m not going to over-explain this. Most men reading this already know.

There’s something — call it conditioning, call it wiring, call it the thing Aaron (my therapist, three-try fit, worth every awkward session it took to get there) would call normative alexithymia — that makes it genuinely hard to know what you’re feeling, let alone say it. The research on this goes back to Ron Levant’s 2009 work in Psychology of Men & Masculinity. Boys are socialized to process emotion privately, stoically, or not at all. The vocabulary doesn’t develop the way it does for people who are encouraged to use it.

Then you’re 38 and your partner asks you why you seem distant and you say “I’m fine” because you literally don’t know what else to say. Not because you’re lying. Because you haven’t built the thing that would let you know.

Writing helps. Pennebaker showed this in 1986, showed it again in 1997 — expressive writing reduces psychological distress, improves physical health markers, changes how people process difficult experiences. Aaron gave me those papers. I read them both. What they don’t address is the blank page problem: a lot of men sit down to write and produce nothing, because writing to nobody about nothing specific isn’t actually that useful.

A conversational AI asks questions. That’s the difference.

The Kinds of Conversations Men Keep Putting Off

The finance conversation. The sex conversation. The “we’ve drifted” conversation. The conversation with your boss about the fact that you’re running on empty and have been for six months. The conversation with your dad about whether he should still be driving. The conversation with your adult kid about money, or expectations, or the years you weren’t fully there.

All of them have the same structure: you know something needs to be said, you don’t know what it is exactly, and the other person’s presence in the room makes it harder to find out.

An AI isn’t in the room. That’s not a limitation. That’s the point.

How I Actually Use It

I don’t ask Claude to write me a script. Scripts don’t work — the other person says something unexpected in the first 90 seconds and now you’re reading from a document that doesn’t apply. What I do instead:

I dump the situation. Messy, incomplete, whatever. “Here’s what’s going on, here’s what I think I want, here’s what I keep avoiding saying.” Then I let Claude ask me questions, and I answer them honestly. Not neatly — honestly. If I don’t know the answer, I say that. Sometimes that’s the most useful thing: Claude asking “what are you actually afraid will happen?” and me typing “I don’t know” and then sitting with that until something real comes up.

Usually I run this for 20 or 30 minutes before a hard conversation. Sometimes I do it the night before. Sometimes it’s three days before, and I come back to it. The goal isn’t a plan. The goal is knowing what I actually want to say, and why, and what matters to me in the outcome.

That’s it. That’s the whole move.

What It Doesn’t Do

It doesn’t have the conversation for you. The hard part is still hard. The woman who ran the front desk at my dentist asked me how I was doing last Tuesday and I gave her the full “I’m wrung out” line and even that — a sentence I’d practiced — still felt like I was lifting something. The actual conversations, with the people who matter, carry weight. AI prep reduces the fumbling. It doesn’t eliminate the weight.

It also can’t tell you whether the conversation is the right one to have. Sometimes you process something and realize you were making it bigger than it was. Sometimes you process something and realize it’s actually a serious problem that needs more than a conversation — it needs a therapist, or a mediator, or a lawyer. Claude isn’t equipped to make those calls, and it won’t try to.

A Note on the Aging Parent Conversation

This one deserves its own mention because it’s particular. The driving conversation. The moving-in conversation. The “we need to talk about what happens when” conversation. These hit different because the power dynamic is reversed — your parent becomes, for maybe the first time, the one who needs something from you — and there’s grief in that even when everybody’s fine.

I’ve talked to a few men over 40 who’ve been putting this conversation off for years. Not because they don’t love their parent. Because they don’t know how to be both honest and kind at the same time, and they’re afraid that if they say the real thing, something breaks.

Typing that out to Claude first — the fear, not just the logistics — tends to untangle it. At least a little.

This Isn’t a Replacement for Anything

I still have Aaron. I still have people I trust. I’m not arguing that AI replaces any of that.

What I’m saying is that the gap between “knowing something needs to be said” and “actually saying it” is where most men live, most of the time, for conversations that matter. And a tool that helps you close that gap — that asks you questions until you find the sentence — is worth knowing about.

The conversation with my ex eventually happened. It was hard. It changed things. I don’t regret having it.

I regret the eleven months I spent finding the door.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top